Talk:Diamond Dragon/@comment-58.166.243.235-20130417082645/@comment-72.251.244.8-20130417184045

Actually no, the statement that you have to disprove something for it to be considered untrue (false evidence as you note) is incorrect according to the scientific method. What you've made is an observation, and formed a hypothesis(effectively speculation) based on repeated observations (whether they were empiracally sound or not is another story however). For it then to be considered a theory (which still isn't at the level of describing something as 'true'), you would need lots of independent, empirically conducted experiments which critically consider your hypothesis. So really, at most you have a hypothesis, at worst an ill-founded observation, but definitely not truth (if it was, you could say that all religion is true, which physically can't be possible given the contradictions between different religions).