Talk:Paper Dragon/@comment-5327956-20120914151408/@comment-5410269-20120914165109

I know that's the policy of the wiki. And I think it's silly, hence my post. Because the same purpose would be served by a simple warning on the page that it might be limited. It would also avoid the problems created by labeling a permanent dragon as limited. Like with the Olympus, there were probably people who saw them labeled as limited for sure and decided to spend gems, time, and maybe real money trying to get them in time. If they'd been marked as possibly limited, pending further info from BFS, maybe those same people would have been more cautious about how much they devoted to getting those dragons and maybe would have checked back more often to see if there had been an update on their status.

I guess I also think it's kind of rude to make the decision for people about what's a "worse" consequence. I say just give people the available information (and no more than!) and let them make their own decisions.

It's a false dichotomy to say that your only choices are categorizing it as limited or non-limited. The english language is capable of more variation than that.